Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Books == | == Books == | ||
blup | blup | ||
| Line 18: | Line 16: | ||
[[File:2023-01-icon-tripartite-semiotics-large.png|200px|thumb|left]] Tripartite Semiotics: | [[File:2023-01-icon-tripartite-semiotics-large.png|200px|thumb|left]] Tripartite Semiotics: | ||
<blockquote> In the nineteenth century, Charles Sanders Peirce defined what he termed "semiotic" (which he would sometimes spell as "semeiotic") as the "quasi-necessary, or formal doctrine of signs," which abstracts "what must be the characters of all signs used by…an intelligence capable of learning by experience,"[16] and which is philosophical logic pursued in terms of signs and sign processes.[17][18] | |||
Peirce's perspective is considered as philosophical logic studied in terms of signs that are not always linguistic or artificial, and sign processes, modes of inference, and the inquiry process in general. The Peircean semiotic addresses not only the external communication mechanism, as per Saussure, but the internal representation machine, investigating sign processes, and modes of inference, as well as the whole inquiry process in general. | Peirce's perspective is considered as philosophical logic studied in terms of signs that are not always linguistic or artificial, and sign processes, modes of inference, and the inquiry process in general. The Peircean semiotic addresses not only the external communication mechanism, as per Saussure, but the internal representation machine, investigating sign processes, and modes of inference, as well as the whole inquiry process in general. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 24: | ||
Peircean scholar and editor Max H. Fisch (1978)[d] would claim that "semeiotic" was Peirce's own preferred rendering of Locke's σημιωτική.[20] Charles W. Morris followed Peirce in using the term "semiotic" and in extending the discipline beyond human communication to animal learning and use of signals. | Peircean scholar and editor Max H. Fisch (1978)[d] would claim that "semeiotic" was Peirce's own preferred rendering of Locke's σημιωτική.[20] Charles W. Morris followed Peirce in using the term "semiotic" and in extending the discipline beyond human communication to animal learning and use of signals. | ||
</blockquote> | |||
[[File:2023-01-icon-philosophy-of-language-large.png|200px|thumb|left]] Philosophy of Language: | [[File:2023-01-icon-philosophy-of-language-large.png|200px|thumb|left]] Philosophy of Language: | ||
Revision as of 11:00, 13 January 2023
Overview
blup
Books
blup
Philosophy
The Info-Ops works are based on a loose synthesis of four major school of philosophic thought.
Pragmatism: is very important
Tripartite Semiotics:
In the nineteenth century, Charles Sanders Peirce defined what he termed "semiotic" (which he would sometimes spell as "semeiotic") as the "quasi-necessary, or formal doctrine of signs," which abstracts "what must be the characters of all signs used by…an intelligence capable of learning by experience,"[16] and which is philosophical logic pursued in terms of signs and sign processes.[17][18]
Peirce's perspective is considered as philosophical logic studied in terms of signs that are not always linguistic or artificial, and sign processes, modes of inference, and the inquiry process in general. The Peircean semiotic addresses not only the external communication mechanism, as per Saussure, but the internal representation machine, investigating sign processes, and modes of inference, as well as the whole inquiry process in general.
Peircean semiotic is triadic, including sign, object, interpretant, as opposed to the dyadic Saussurian tradition (signifier, signified). Peircean semiotics further subdivides each of the three triadic elements into three sub-types, positing the existence of signs that are symbols; semblances ("icons"); and "indices," i.e., signs that are such through a factual connection to their objects.[19]
Peircean scholar and editor Max H. Fisch (1978)[d] would claim that "semeiotic" was Peirce's own preferred rendering of Locke's σημιωτική.[20] Charles W. Morris followed Peirce in using the term "semiotic" and in extending the discipline beyond human communication to animal learning and use of signals.
Philosophy of Language:
Analytic Philosophy:
Synthesis
blup
Derivative Work
blup
Common Fallacies
blup
The result of all of this helps address common rhetorical fallacies found on the internet
Iconography
For information on what the various icons mean, check out iconography page.
Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.